The first response to Saint Anselms Ontological Argument comes from: (Anselms Ontological Review, vol. 69, no. 1 (1960), 4162 by Norman Malcolm). According to Malcolms view, the existence of an unlimited being is said to be either rationally necessary or logically not possible. The premises of Anselms ontological argument were demonstrated to be sound when examined in the context of Anselms definition of the Greatest Conceivable Being.
Moreover, Anselms argument was shown to be a valid argument, with a conclusion that follows from the premises.
Anselm's Second Version of the Ontological Argument As it turns out, there are two different versions of the ontological argument in the Prosologium. The second version does not rely on the highly problematic claim that existence is a property and hence avoids many of the objections to the classic version. Malcolm, Anselms Ontological Argument.
Defence of modal ontological arguments by a wellknown ordinary language philosopher. While Dombrowskis book is a useful addition to the literature because of the scope of its discussion of ontological argumentsfor example, it contains a chapter on Rorty on ontological arguments, and The Ontological Argument The Ontological Argument In Anselm's ontological argument he is trying to prove the existence of God, his argument is an argument purely based on the mind and does not require the moral agent to venture into the real of the senses.
Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay In Chapter 2 of Anselm's Proslogian, Anselm offers what was later to be characterized as his Ontological Argument, which is an argument for God's existence he felt was so strong that even a fool as is said in Psalms 14: 1" who has said in his heart, 'There is no God. Anselm's Ontological Argument.
Anselm's ontological argument purports to be an a priori proof of God's existence. Anselm starts with premises that do not depend on experience for their justification and then proceeds by purely logical means to Anselms ontological argument Anselms ontological argument for the existence of God corners around the definition of God as a being than which nothing greater can be conceived as well as two modes of existence, in the understanding and in reality (Anselm Chapter 2).
Essay Anselms Ontological Argument The ontological argument for Gods existence is a work of art resulting from philosophical argumentation. An ontological argument for the existence of God is one that attempts the method of a priori proof, which utilizes intuition and reason alone.
Anselms Ontological Argument for the Existence of God Anselms argument is an a priori argument; that is, it is an argument that is independent of experience and based solely on concepts and logical relations, like a mathematical